Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The Prophets of Cyberspace: A rough guide to cyberpunk

In the late seventies a new flavour of science fiction began to take shape. Its earliest ancestors had first appeared in both “new age” science fiction and the authors of the beat generation. In the intervening time it had slowly formed a new definition for itself through the works of J.G. Ballard and Philip K. Dick, until reaching a point in the early eighties when the cultural obsession with excess and mass media provided the perfect literary genesis pool for the emerging counter culture prophets of cyberpunk.

Abandoning galaxy spanning empires and laser toting aliens in favour of the more familiar settings of abandoned territories and near future cities, like neon wombs breeding cybernetic street gangs, corporate warriors and digital pop stars. Cyberpunk takes us into worlds not that far beyond the horizon from our own. Deeply entrenched in the familiar with elements just alien enough that they might be happening in another city somewhere, just on the other side of tomorrow. In the three decades since its first predictions we can clearly see that they prophesised the popularity of reality television and the total pervasion of the internet happened somewhere between Bruce Sterling’s The Artificial Kid and William Gibson’s Cyber Space Trilogy.


With much of the traditional fictitious elements of cyberpunk having become parts of our everyday lives it comes of no surprise that many other brands of modern science fiction carry these same elements that are associated with cyberpunk without fully submersing themselves into the stream. Such as The Matrix, which only barely walks the outskirts, having themes and motifs more in common with post-apocalyptic or machine war SF. Like all mimics of any punk movement, they wear the colours but run in different circles. Cyberpunk was never just a collection of hacker stories set in glass walled cities and the slums that surround them. It’s a voice and an ethos defined by the very culture that birthed it, where the corporate world has adopted the methods and tactics of street culture in a setting that is thrown at us, where chapters read like scenes in a film, some barely clocking in at a page, and the books themselves pace as though measured in frames per second. The prose itself charges along in mbps between street speak and stream of consciousness. If you are interested in running deep in this pure flavour, books like Snow Crash and Blood Music deliver in spades. If you are a sci-fi cinema junkie, Cypher, New Rose Hotel and Natural City are undiluted, cut straight from the source.


For me nothing sits closer to the heart of cyberpunk than the literary channel surfing of Mirrorshades and Burning Chrome. Short story compilations birthed straight from the neon womb in portions engineered for the short attention span generation that shared its childhood.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
99
Vote
   


The Rules of the Game: A beginner's guide to hard sci-fi

The science fiction I spent my youth with consisted of faster than light travel, aliens who spoke perfect English for no good reason and sword fighting on mars. While this brand of science fiction is where most of us teethed, there are those pundits who believe that this flavour of “nonsense”, having no actual basis in real ‘science’, should have the word removed from its name. There have been arguments where terms such as ‘Space Fantasy’ got used a little too liberally and some trekkies get somewhat belligerent. Eventually the extremists ended their holy war and settled on the term Hard Sci-Fi, the general idea being that all Hard Sci-Fi is based on actual science, whether for the entire premise of the story or simply for the setting. As with all aspects of science fiction, there are disagreements. Some people are very black and white, drawing a line at what can be proven conclusively now, while others construct elaborate grading systems designating everything from Babylon 5 down into various grades of mushiness, and assigning everything from Dune up varying degrees of solidity.

This hard-line taken by learned folk in white coats doesn’t in any way detract from my interest in, and appreciation of, hard sci-fi, because despite the boring and educational implications of scientific accuracy, it often adds a strong sense of plausibility to the work in question. It’s a strange realisation while reading Kim Stanley Robinson’s Mars Trilogy that this may actually happen one day, but If 1700 pages of the colonisation and terraforming of the red planet isn’t your cup of tea, then it’s worth getting hold of 2009’s Moon starring Sam Rockwell. It’s an easier transition into the sub-genre that will only cost you 97 minutes of your life, and it’s an outstanding piece of cinematic writing and directing where the accuracy stands more as a setting and general approach than an overall theme.

The hard cyber-punk of William Gibson’s Bridge Trilogy is a wholly desirable piece of work in this respect, and has been my go-to SF trilogy for all oppositionists who don’t like the space bound settings and ‘ridiculous’ premises of a majority of my library. Ever since my first trip into the media obsessed near future of hackers and corporate warfare that is Virtual Light I have considered it a law unto itself. It still lives the wild adventure of the Cyber Space Trilogy with its edges hardened into something nearly happened in its tangibility. Its hardness gives it credence.

In a more traditional setting the anime series Planetes is deep in the folds of hard sci-fi with the entire premise, setting and many of the sub-plots revolving heavily around a realistic and technically accurate speculation on the future of space travel. The main characters are responsible for recovering the satellites and other space debris that have become a hazard in the space age. The laws of orbital physics, known and theoretical space travel related illnesses as well as the limitations of interplanetary travel are not only adhered to, but essential for the unfolding and direction of the plot. If you pay attention, you may even learn something about the history of space travel.

It is in the policing of this realism that we find The Game. A brandished rapier and glove in the face, that revolves heavily around scientific ridicule and public humiliation. It is a challenge put forth by the authors and taken up by his audience, and the rules of The Game go a little something like this:

1. Approach a literary, cinematic or television work of science fiction having taken all the necessary safety precautions.
2. Subject all elements of the work in question to the rigors of scientific experimentation and theory.
3. Publish all scientific errors to your nearest internet and hope that you too haven’t made mistakes.
4. No eye gouging.

Every time a Hard Sci-Fi author publishes a book, this is the gauntlet they must endure. This has lead public mockery at science fiction conventions, and in the case of Larry Niven this has resulted in the publishing of corrected reprints and the writing of sequels with retroactive fixes to his scientific blunders. From the outside it appears very harrowing. Which is why it’s entertaining. I personally have never taken part in The Game as all of the science I have learnt since high school comes from books about the accuracies and inaccuracies in science fiction.

I still like your books Larry.
Comments (3)Comments (3) Add CommentsAdd Comments
116
Vote
   


Choose Your Own Adventures: The Conundrum with Canon

Every fan has to make a choice. I made that choice. For me there will always only ever be three Star Wars films. This is a purity I have endeavoured to maintain. Whether it be for Star Wars, Doctor Who or Transformers, I’ve spent years avoiding not only expanded universe material like the plague, but quite often other official materials. I have had my infidelities in the past. After the disappointment of Episode One I read Shadows of the Empire at the urging of a friend, but despite the relief it brought me I quickly ran back to the safety of my quarantine, because once you enter the murky waters of the expanded universes you are willingly going face to face with the ever shifting Hydra of Canon. This is why I was staying out. At least that was the plan.

I now have nine Star Wars books on my night stand, and I can hear the beast in the swirling mists. Immediately turning to the internet for some guidance, I find that my beloved wookie laden universe has four official levels of canon. This is not an uncommon trend, it’s a neat way to rank the extensive contradictions that tend to arise when you try and milk the fans’ wallets without planning ahead. In the end they just fall back on “because George says so”, and that’s why the most official level is called G-Canon.

A similar, though slightly more confusing, approach to the "because we said so" line was adopted by the people behind the Macross series. After someone called them on the use of runways in zero-G environments they dropped them for the feature film which itself was meant to be an in-universe historical film, and then kept all the design elements from the film, but the plot points from series as Canon. Then they made a sequel which no one liked so they called it a parallel universe, and got right back to business with Macross Plus, which everyone liked. Everything after that is fine, unless you talk to Harmony Gold who like to think none of it is canon outside of Japan.

Doctor Who fans have been handed a slightly different bag of snakes. On one hand the series itself, which is considered the highest level of canon, is rife with its own contradictions before you even introduce the expanded universe. On the other hand it’s a story about a guy with a time machine that has a habit of changing history, so much so, that he got executed for it (Troughton to Pertwee). This constant rewriting of history is now the party line according to new head writer Steven Moffatt. It all happened and then some of it unhappened.

Navigating any universe in which dozens of writers have contributed is always going to be difficult, but what do you do when all materials are written by one man. For none know the fetid breath of the hydra like anybody that has invested any time in the many space operas of Leiji Matsumoto (Space Pirate Captain Harlock, Space Battle Ship Yamato and Galaxy Express 999). At every new release we stand toe to toe and the waters a deep and coffee coloured. Mr Matsumoto’s work, which I can’t get enough of, is all connected. Consisting of at least half a dozen story lines each with films, comics and television series, intertwining and contradicting themselves and each other, thrashing at your sense of order and continuity like a four year old recounting his Saturday. We are talking about a level of discontinuity only dreamed about by the combined Star Wars fanfic writers, all accomplished by a single man. In honour of its fluid nature and Star Blazers, I have dubbed this approach Wave Motion Canon.

Having intrepidly traversed the entirety of Leiji’s mayhem for years after investing heavily in a cartoon from 1977 that is no longer ‘in’, I have come to my own conclusions on canonicity. You don’t have to follow the official party line. Remember though that you are never alone. As you stand before the beast you stand shoulder to shoulder with other hitchhikers through the maelstrom. Some petulant, like the Doctor Who fans that tried to get Paul McGann de-canonised, others defiant, such as fans determined to find explanations to include all materials despite the inconsistencies that keep them awake at night, and others simpy passive aggressive, who make snide remarks about the original creators in their blogs while espousing their own continuities. With this in mind, I set out on my journey into the Star Wars Expanded Universe, and I’m making my own rules. It’s called J-Canon, and you know what George, there are only three movies, Darth Vader didn’t make C-3PO and Jar Jar never existed.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
73
Vote
   


How to trick you friends and family into loving science fiction

Like most science fiction fans I was indoctrinated from a young age. My cousin, much to his credit, introduced me to Star Wars, 2000 A.D. and Bio of Space Tyrant before I hit double digits. This was the beginning of my education and after a few years of splashing around in the shallow end my father presented me with tattered copies of The Demolished Man, Tiger Tiger and Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy. I am entrenched. I have become the pusher. Am I now the kind of person who forces their significant other to watch the latest episode of Doctor Who with fish fingers and custard? Yes, I am.

Why do we even set out on this endeavor? Are we spreading the good word? Do we hope that their new found appreciation will build a strong foundation for our relationship? Personally I'm thickening the ranks for when the vote is cast for what film we are going to see


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
52
Vote
   


The 11th Doctor in 2010

It’s 2010. The year of the 2nd odyssey. We are in science fiction country now. Sleek monstrosities of glass and steel invade the sky, personal com-units destroy our reproductive organs and cloning and cybernetics are well underway. The most important thing to remember is to stay calm.

This is a big year. Futurama is coming back, The Germans might be making a Captain Future movie and The Doctor has a new face. I know a lot of you were upset about the departure of David Tennant. He was a good Doctor. He sank into the role with gusto and delivered a character that was both faithful to the original series and engaging for new viewers. No mean feat. The tenth incarnation has definitely earned his chops. However, this does in no way decrease my excitement over the arrival of the 11th


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
17
Vote
   


The Little Black Box

I am a watcher. For my first two decades I lived and breathed VHS. Coveting the magic bricks that let me watch 'Flash Gordon' whenever I damn well pleased. Even now my fetish blossoms as I rummage through my mother's garage of mislabeled boxes to be rewarded with the black plastic treasures of my youth. I rush to the living room, noticing that my adult hands had grown to the perfect size to brandish the cassette as an extension of my self, only to be denied by the sleek DVD player by the television.

The future comes to fast. After journeying through the distant reaches of science fiction for better part of my life, one would assume this to be less of a shock. Alas, here I stand 'Captain Harlock' in hand, with the realisation that I will probably have to order DVDs from France and watch it with German subtitles. Why did 'Blade Runner' never prepare me for this?
Add CommentsAdd Comments
15
Vote
   


Better People

John Whydham's The Chrysalids is my favourite type of Sci fi. The world has been through a major holocaust and the new religious system outlaws any kind of deformity. It is considered ungodly to be mutated in any way. A young boy named David is a mutant with the abitlity to communicate with thought pictures. He and his friens communicate by sending mental images to each other. His new sister is found to be more powerful than any of them and can send a distress call which influences the others to rescue her when she is in trouble. Eventually they are found out however and must flee. It seems that the story is having a say about the world's attitude about those who are different. It works for awhile, however I am afraid there is a weakness in the tale. When the group is found by others like them, living in New Zealand (or new Sea land and they call it) they go to live with them. These people have an attitude about the "normal" people. It seems that the "new" people are more advanced than the "old" and they are considered better. This is where, I feel the story fails to make its point. If the mutants don't like being considered abnormal why are they apparently "better" than the others. It focuses on the idea of evolution (which I don't believe in) arguing that since they are more advanced than the less evolved. It was this kind of belief that made white europeans believe they were more advanced and thus "better" than races such as the Aboriginal people of Australia. This does not mean I completely disapprove of the book, it's quite good, but I think there is a failure there. What do you think?
Add CommentsAdd Comments
77
Vote
   


Looking into the Future

One of man's greatest desires is to look into the future. Why because we just can't wait. Everybody want's to know their future- hence the reason for the desire to see Tarot card readers and the like. However the future isn't always pretty, so why do we still want to see it? One idea is that it can act like a warning. In the film, Minority Report Chief John Anderton helps prevent murders from happening with the help of three people called the Pre-cogs. The pre-cogs were the accidental result of genetic mutation. Due to their "gifts" they are used to create a murder-free town. It seems like a good thing - but is it? When John himself is propesied to commit a murder John goes on the run to solve the mystery - but is his fate already sealed? After kidnapping Agatha, in order to find a "minority report", which is an alternate future he is given one. However Agatha insists that he can still choose his future, which he eventually does. At the end of the film the pre-cogs are set free and the pre-crime division is closed down. It seems it is best not too look into the future. If the future can change what is the point of looking at it - however if it cannot would you really want to?
Comments (1)Comments (1) Add CommentsAdd Comments
117
Vote
   


Another Threat to Mankind - Infertility

Science Fiction is often an avenue to express certain fears. Fears about the future, about the state of the world today and fears about ourselves. One common fear is the end of the human race. This has been explored in many ways and fairly recently a couple of films have arisen about the human failure to reproduce. Both Aeon Flux (Based on the MTV Cartoon) and Children of men address the posibility of women becoming infertile and thus ending the future of all mankind. How could this happen?

In Children of Men the reason is uncertain. It could have been polution, genetic mutation - who knows? The reason given in Aeon Flux is human intervention. After an industrial disease threatens to eliminate mankind scientist Trevor Goodchild invents a cure. Victory is short term however as it is discovered that this miracle cure has caused women to become infertile. The threat to mankind continues. Thus Goodchild comes up with a temporary solution - cloning. The problem with this solution - with all of Goodchild's solutions - is that it is artificial. How does man overcome these problems? Man doesn't. The answer is in nature's hands or perhaps God's hands.

[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Comments (4)Comments (4) Add CommentsAdd Comments
126
Vote
   


Madness, Paranoia and the Government

Watching the film, "A Scanner Darkly" based on the Phillip K. Dick novel is like watching a huge drug trip. By the end it finally makes sense but from the second the film begins you are lost in a world of confusion and paranoia. With the developing surveilance technologies, terrorism and drug use this film could not be more relevant to today's world as it is to the time it was written. The film opens with a paranoid Charles Freck trying desperately to rid his body of non existent bugs crawling over his body as a result of taking the drug Substance D. And so begins the madness. We are introduced next to Fred - a spy whose identity is not even shown to his superiors who is working with the government to erradicate the drug problem. Fred is currently surveying Robert Arctor a suspected drug dealer who, unbeknown to Fred is Fred's split personality caused by his own use of the drug. The film takes the viewer through a series of events which lead Arctor/Fred further and further into madness. One interesting scene is when Arctor and his roommates Jim Barris and Ernie Luckman burst into their apartment, certain that someone has broken in and planted substance D in their home in order to incriminate them. They soon discover that it was only Arctor's girlfriend Donna Hawthorne, however the scene shows the utter paranoia not only from the drug use but from pressures from the government. Another great representation of the madness and paranoia are the suits that Fred and the other spies where in order to hide their identity. The suit shows scrambled physiques of many people thus denying the observer any idea who the person is. In the same way Fred's identity is scrambled by the drug and by the government he works for.
It is discovered by the end of the film that Fred/Arctor was deliberately put on the drug in order to lead him to the New Path recovery centre and later to the farms where they suspect the flowers that are used to create the drug are being grown. There, he becomes Bruce. It is also discovered that Arctor's girlfriend Donna Hawthorne is actually Hank, Fred's superior and it was she who helped work to get Fred/ Arctor/Bruce to the farms.
Overall it is a story about a corrupt government that sacrifices a real human being in order to save the majority. All the these things: the paranoia, the drug use and the questionable deeds of the government are relevant to today. It sure makes you think doesn't it?
Comments (2)Comments (2) Add CommentsAdd Comments
134
Vote
   


More Posts
6 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
32 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Jacob Henwood's Blogs

362 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
6 Post(s)
58 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by Jacob Henwood
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]